4.6 Review

New Insight and Future Perspectives on Nutraceuticals for Improving Sports Performance of Combat Players: Focus on Natural Supplements, Importance and Advantages over Synthetic Ones

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 12, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app12178611

关键词

nutrition; sports performance; dietary supplements; vitamins; minerals; proteins; nutraceuticals

资金

  1. University of Oradea, Romania

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Advanced nutritional interventions are crucial for enhancing the performance of elite combat sports athletes. These sports require a high percentage of muscle mass and a minimum body weight to achieve maximum power. It is important for combat athletes to have a sufficient level of nutrition knowledge to determine energy needs, avoid the use of incorrect dietary supplements, and dispel false perceptions regarding steroid requirements.
Advanced nutritional interventions are one of the key components of elite sports performance in general. Combat sports require a high percentage of muscle mass with minimum body weight to generate the maximum power possible. An adequate level of nutrition knowledge, particularly with respect to identifying energy needs while avoiding confusion over dietary supplements and false perceptions of steroid requirement, which may compromise the health condition, is of crucial importance. In this context, the aim of our work is to highlight nutritional requirements/nutritional assessment, the importance of daily dietary intake in combat players, which increasingly includes a broad range of sports nutrition supplements, and the roles of vitamins, minerals and proteins, combined with antioxidants and strength training, in muscular performance. The main nutrients required in the daily diet of combat players, the mechanisms of action, the main outcomes and possible side effects are summarized. Special attention is paid to natural supplements and their importance and advantages over synthetic ones, along with future trends of development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据