4.6 Article

Characterisation of Refined Marc Distillates with Alternative Oak Products Using Different Analytical Approaches

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 12, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app12178444

关键词

spirits; VOCs; oak chips; NMR; NIR; GC-MS; e-nose

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the use of unconventional wood formats in the production of distilled spirits and evaluated their effects on grape pomace distillate. The results showed that the toasting level and wood assortment influenced the release of aroma compounds, with sliced wood producing higher levels of volatile secondary metabolites. Analysis using NIR, NMR, and e-nose also demonstrated differences among different wood types, with e-nose showing promise as a simple and portable alternative to spectroscopic methods.
The use of oak barrel alternatives, including oak chips, oak staves and oak powder, is quite common in the production of spirits obtained from the distillation of vegetal fermented products such as grape pomace. This work explored the use of unconventional wood formats such as peeled and sliced wood. The use of poplar wood was also evaluated to verify its technological uses to produce aged spirits. To this aim, GC-MS analyses were carried out to obtain an aromatic characterisation of experimental distillates treated with these products. Moreover, the same spirits were studied for classification purposes using NMR, NIR and e-nose. A significant change in the original composition of grape pomace distillate due to sorption phenomena was observed; the intensity of this effect was greater for poplar wood. The release of aroma compounds from wood depended both on the toasting level and wood assortment. Higher levels of xylovolatiles, namely, whisky lactone, were measured in samples aged using sliced woods. Both the NIR and NMR analyses highlighted similarities among samples refined with oak tablets, differentiating them from the other wood types. Finally, E-nose seemed to be a promising alternative to spectroscopic methods both for the simplicity of sample preparation and method portability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据