4.5 Article

Stabilizing and Improving Qubit Coherence by Engineering the Noise Spectrum of Two-Level Systems

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW APPLIED
卷 18, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.18.044026

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, National Quantum Information Science Research Centers, Superconducting Quantum Materials and Systems Center (SQMS) [DE-AC02-07CH11359]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a method to alleviate the limited coherence times in superconducting circuits by designing the noise spectral densities of quantum bits. Specifically, by depolarizing and dephasing the material defects, the high-frequency noise spectrum is smoothed and the low-frequency noise amplitude is suppressed, resulting in a stabilized qubit lifetime and an increased qubit pure dephasing time.
Superconducting circuits are a leading platform for quantum computing. However, their coherence times are still limited and exhibit temporal fluctuations. Those phenomena are often attributed to the coupling between qubits and material defects that can be well described as an ensemble of two-level systems (TLSs). Among them, charge fluctuators inside amorphous oxide layers contribute to both low-frequency 1/f charge noise and high-frequency dielectric loss, causing fast qubit dephasing and relaxation. Moreover, spectral diffusion from mutual TLS interactions varies the noise amplitude over time, fluctuating the qubit lifetime. Here, we propose to mitigate those harmful effects by engineering the relevant TLS noise spectral densities. Specifically, our protocols smooth the high-frequency noise spectrum and suppress the low-frequency noise amplitude via depolarizing and dephasing the TLSs, respectively. As a result, we predict a drastic stabilization in qubit lifetime and an increase in qubit pure dephasing time. Our detailed analysis of feasible experimental implementations shows that the improvement is not compromised by spurious coupling from the applied noise to the qubit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据