4.7 Article

Manufacturing Bulk Nanocrystalline Al-3Mg Components Using Cryomilling and Spark Plasma Sintering

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 12, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano12203618

关键词

nanocrystalline; aluminum; cryomilling; sintering; synthesis; characterization; mechanical properties

资金

  1. US Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-EE0009116]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effect of cryomilling on the crystallite size of pure aluminum and magnesium-doped aluminum, and the subsequent improvement in mechanical properties. The results showed that the addition of magnesium and longer cryomilling duration led to a significant reduction in crystallite size, resulting in improved hardness of the materials.
In the current study, pure aluminum (Al) powders were cryomilled with and without 3 wt.% pure magnesium (Mg) dopant for varying durations followed by spark plasma sintering (SPS) of powders to prepare bulk components with superior mechanical properties. The crystallite sizes were determined for powders and the bulk components by analyzing the X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectrum. The calculations indicated a reduction in crystallite size with the increase in the cryomilling duration. The results also showed a more significant decrease in the crystallite sizes for Al-3Mg samples than that of pure Al. The changes in the surface morphology of powders were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The elemental mapping analysis at nanoscale was carried out using Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) in Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM). The mechanical properties of the bulk components were assessed using a Vickers Microhardness tester. The test results demonstrated an improvement in the hardness of Mg-doped components. Higher hardness values were also reported with an increase in the cryomilling duration. This article discusses the mechanisms for the reduction in crystallite size for pure Al and Al-3Mg and its subsequent impact on improving mechanical properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据