4.5 Article

Mineralogical and Geochemical Characteristics of Carbonates and Their Geological Significance to the Fuli Pb-Zn Deposit, Yunnan Province

期刊

MINERALS
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/min12101317

关键词

LA-MC-ICPMS; C-O isotope; source of metallogenic material; Fuli Pb-Zn deposit; Sichuan-Yunnan-Guizhou Pb-Zn metallogenic province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Fuli Pb-Zn deposit in eastern Yunnan, China, belongs to Mississippi Valley-Type (MVT) deposits. The study on this deposit provides important information on the evolutionary process of metallogenic fluids and is crucial for exploration purposes.
Mississippi Valley-Type (MVT) deposits are among the main types of Pb-Zn deposits that feature carbonate minerals as the main gangue minerals; their formation runs through the entire metallogenic process of MVT deposits. Therefore, carbonate minerals contain rich information on metallogenic fluid evolution and are thus important prospecting indicators. The Fuli Pb-Zn deposit in eastern Yunnan is located in the southeast of the Sichuan-Yunnan-Guizhou (SYG) Pb-Zn metallogenic province, which is the biggest producer of zinc and lead in China and contains more than 400 deposits and over 20 million tons of Pb + Zn reserves. The ore occurs in the interlayer fracture zone of Middle Permian Yangxin Formation Dolomite, and the orebody shape is generally stratiform. The main metal-bearing minerals of this deposit are sphalerite, galena, and pyrite; the gangue minerals mainly comprise dolomite and calcite. Three mineralized stages are observed (the early metallogenic period, the main metallogenic period, and the late metallogenic period) according to the characteristics of stratigraphic output, the intercalated contact relationship of gangue minerals, and the alteration characteristics of the wall rock. To determine the source and properties of the ore-forming fluid and the ore-forming process of the Fuli Pb-Zn deposit, different stages of mineralogy and trace element geochemical characteristics of hydrothermal dolomite were systematically studied. The minerals were observed under microscope and subjected to in situ analysis by LA-ICP-MS and C-O isotope test. The delta O-18(SMOW) value of the dolomite in the metallogenic period was between 13.29 parts per thousand and 20.55 parts per thousand, and the delta C-13(PDB) value was between -4.13 parts per thousand and 3.5 parts per thousand. Dolomite of the metallogenic period mainly came from the dissolution of carbonate wall rocks, while C in the ore-forming fluid came from the wall rocks. A few dolomites showed a trend of depleting delta C-13(PDB) and delta O-18(SMOW) at the same time, implying the influence of sedimentary rock contamination in the mantle multiphase system. The lower delta O-18 was due to the exchange of O isotopes between the wall rocks and the depleted delta O-18 in ore-forming fluids. From the early to the later stage of mineralization, the ore-forming fluid changed from alkaline to neutral to weakly acidic due to a decrease in the oxygen fugacity and temperature of the fluid; this change resulted in the precipitation of sulfide and dolomite in the deposit. From the early to the late stages of mineralization, Fe and Mn showed a downward trend. Fe and Mn entered the alkaline environment of the carbonate minerals, while Fe and Mn were released into the acidic fluid, indicating that due to the metasomatism from strong to weak, their metallogenic environment evolved from alkaline to acidic. From the early to the late stage of mineralization, Sr showed an upward trend, which might indicate that the continuous reaction between the hydrothermal fluid and the wall rock continuously released Sr into the fluid. The Fe-Sr and Mn-Sr diagrams show that two kinds of fluid mixing occurred in the ore-forming process. The Fuli Pb-Zn deposit may have formed from mineral precipitation caused by the mixing of the metal-rich, oxidized acidic fluid and the sulfur-rich, reduced alkaline fluid. The results show that the Fuli Pb-Zn deposit belongs to MVT deposits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据