4.6 Article

Development and Application of InDel Markers Linked to Fruit-Shape and Peel-Colour Genes in Wax Gourd

期刊

GENES
卷 13, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes13091567

关键词

fruit shape; gene; InDel marker; peel colour; wax gourd

资金

  1. Gene cloning, Gene Marker Development and New Variety Breeding of Important Traits of Chieh-qua [GuiKeAB21220029]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, InDel markers linked to fruit-shape and peel-colour genes of wax gourd were developed and evaluated. The results showed that these markers exhibited high accuracy rates and could be used for genetic linkage map construction, molecular-marker-assisted selective breeding, and purity determination of wax gourd hybrids.
The wax gourd is commonly grown in many countries because of its high nutritional and economic value. While the genes for the fruit shape and peel colour of wax gourd have been reported, the InDel markers linked to these genes remain undeveloped. In this study, the InDel markers linked to fruit-shape (Bch02G016830) and peel-colour (Bch05G003950) genes were developed from resequenced data. We used 120 inbred lines, 536 isolated populations, and 4 commercial hybrids to evaluate the validity and application value of the InDel markers. The accuracy rates of nine pairs of fruit-shape InDel markers (GX1-GX9) were 84.16-91.66% in 120 inbred lines. The accuracy rates of 27 pairs of peel-colour InDel markers (PS1-PS27) within approximately 3.0 Mb upstream and 3.0 Mb downstream of the peel-colour gene were 100% and those of 6 pairs of peel-colour InDel markers (PS28-PS33) within 3.0-20 Mb upstream and downstream of the peel-colour gene were 55.83-90% in 120 inbred lines. The purity of four commercial hybrids determined using GX1, GX2, PS13, and PS14 was highly consistent with the field results for purity determination. Our results provide important information for genetic linkage map construction, molecular-marker-assisted selective breeding, and purity determination of wax gourd hybrids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据