4.7 Review

Network meta-analysis of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for diabetic kidney disease

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.967317

关键词

diabetic kidney disease (DKD); mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA); type2 diabetes; hyperkalemia; network meta-analysis (NMA)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong [82000785, 81700730]
  3. Guangzhou Science and Technology Project [2019A1515110661, 2017A030313555]
  4. Outstanding Youth Development Scheme of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University [202201010971]
  5. Undergraduate Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program, Southern Medical University ( [2019J010]
  6. [202112121007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This network meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of different types of MRAs in patients with diabetic kidney disease. The results showed that finerenone, esaxerenone, and apararenone were associated with a significant reduction in proteinuria, and finerenone may have potential superiority in kidney protection. None of the treatments were associated with a higher probability of controlling systolic blood pressure compared to placebo. However, spironolactone, esaxerenone, and 20 mg finerenone presented a higher risk of hyperkalemia.
Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is one of the major causes of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). To evaluate the efficacy and safety of different types of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in diabetic kidney disease patients, we conducted this network meta-analysis by performing a systematic search in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and . A total of 12 randomized clinical trials with 15,492 patients applying various types of MRAs covering spironolactone, eplerenone, finerenone, esaxerenone, and apararenone were included. The efficacy outcomes were the ratio of urine albumin creatine ratio (UACR) at posttreatment vs. at baseline, change in posttreatment estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) vs. at baseline, and change in posttreatment systolic blood pressure (SBP) vs. at baseline. The safety outcome was the number of patients suffering from hyperkalemia. High-dose finerenone (MD -0.31, 95% CI: -0.52, -0.11), esaxerenone (MD -0.54, 95% CI: -0.72, -0.30), and apararenone (MD -0.63, 95% CI: -0.90, -0.35) were associated with a superior reduction in proteinuria in patients with DKD. Regarding the change in eGFR, the results of all drugs were similar, and finerenone may have potential superiority in protecting the kidney. Compared with placebo, none of the treatments was associated with a higher probability of controlling systolic blood pressure during treatment. Moreover, spironolactone, esaxerenone, and 20 mg of finerenone presented a higher risk of hyperkalemia. This Bayesian network meta-analysis was the first to explore the optimal alternative among MRAs in the treatment of DKD and revealed the superiority of 20 mg of finerenone among MRAs in treating DKD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据