4.5 Article

The structure of optimal parameters for image restoration problems

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2015.09.023

关键词

Total variation; Total generalised variation; Bi-level optimisation; Optimality; Parameter choice

资金

  1. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) Award [KUK-I1-007-43]
  2. EPSRC [EP/J009539/1, EP/M00483X/1]
  3. Escuela Politecnica Nacional de Quito [PIS 12-14]
  4. MATHAmSud project SOCDE Sparse Optimal Control of Differential Equations
  5. Senescyt (Ecuadorian Ministry of Science, Technology, Education, and Innovation)
  6. EPSRC [EP/J009539/1, EP/M00483X/1, EP/N014588/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Alan Turing Institute [TU/B/000071] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/N014588/1, EP/M00483X/1, EP/J009539/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study the qualitative properties of optimal regularisation parameters in variational models for image restoration. The parameters are solutions of bilevel optimisation problems with the image restoration problem as constraint. A general type of regulariser is considered, which encompasses total variation (TV), total generalised variation (TGV) and infimal-convolution total variation (ICTV). We prove that under certain conditions on the given data optimal parameters derived by bilevel optimisation problems exist. A crucial point in the existence proof turns out to be the boundedness of the optimal parameters away from 0 which we prove in this paper. The analysis is done on the original in image restoration typically non-smooth variational problem as well as on a smoothed approximation set in Hilbert space which is the one considered in numerical computations. For the smoothed bilevel problem we also prove that it Gamma converges to the original problem as the smoothing vanishes. All analysis is done in function spaces rather than on the discretised learning problem. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据