4.3 Review

Antiplatelet therapy after noncardioembolic ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack

期刊

EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 15, 期 9, 页码 1027-1038

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2022.2118713

关键词

Antithrombotic therapy; cerebrovascular events; prevention; stroke; transient ischemic attack

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review provides an overview of current evidence on antiplatelet therapy for patients with non-cardioembolic stroke or TIA, and suggests recommended drug treatment options and new research directions.
Introduction Antiplatelet therapy is key to prevent recurrences in patients with an acute or prior non-cardioembolic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). The narrow balance between the risks of ischemic recurrence and major bleeding is a relevant clinical dilemma in this population. Areas covered This review covers the current evidence on antiplatelet therapy for patients with non-cardioembolic stroke or TIA. Randomized controlled trials of antithrombotic strategies for patients with these conditions were searched in Pubmed/Medline from 1970 to 2022. Expert opinion Numerous randomized controlled trials have defined the current indications to the use of antiplatelet drugs for patients with non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke or TIA. For the management of these subjects, single antiplatelet therapy with aspirin or clopidogrel, or the combination of aspirin and dipyridamole, is usually recommended. After an acute stroke or TIA, a short course of dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin in combination with clopidogrel or ticagrelor should be considered. The risk of bleeding might be higher with ticagrelor, but a direct comparison with clopidogrel is not available in this setting. The introduction of newer strategies, such as dual-pathway inhibition with aspirin and a direct oral anticoagulant (including emerging factor XI inhibitors under clinical development) may open a new research avenue in this challenging area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据