4.6 Article

Highly expressed carbohydrate sulfotransferase 11 correlates with unfavorable prognosis and immune evasion of hepatocellular carcinoma

期刊

CANCER MEDICINE
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 4938-4950

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5186

关键词

CHST11; hepatocellular carcinoma; prognosis; Treg cells

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that CHST11 expression is upregulated in HCC and is associated with tumor progression and prognosis. It affects immune function in HCC by modulating pathways related to tumor growth, metastasis, and immune regulation, promoting Tregs infiltration and increasing PD-L1/PD-1 expression, resulting in immunosuppression. Targeting CHST11 may enhance the antineoplastic effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Despite great advance has been made in multi-modality treatments for HCC patients, the effectiveness is far from satisfactory with worse survival outcome, which may be partly explainable by the anti-tumor deficiency of the immune system. It is necessary to clarify the molecular mechanism of HCC immunodeficiency. Here, we demonstrated that carbohydrate sulfotransferase 11 (CHST11) was upregulated in HCC and related to advanced TNM stage. HCC patients with TP53 mutation showed higher CHST11 expression. Survival analysis revealed that CHST11 was an independent prognostic biomarker in HCC. Cellular functional experiments indicated that knockdown of CHST11 in HCC inhibited cell proliferation and metastasis. Gene functional enrichment analyses indicated that CHST11 modulated pathways related to tumor growth, metastasis and immune regulation. Continuative immune-related analyses revealed that CHST11 expression facilitated Tregs infiltration in HCC and promoted the expression of checkpoints PD-L1/PD-1, resulting in the immunosuppression of HCC. Targeting CHST11 may inhibit Tregs infiltration and enhance the antineoplastic effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors, which provides a novel insight into the combination immunotherapy with Treg-modulating agents and PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据