4.5 Review

Uncovering sex/gender differences of arithmetic in the human brain: Insights from fMRI studies

期刊

BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2775

关键词

arithmetic processing; brain; fMRI; gender differences; mathematical cognition; sex differences

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology [MOST 110-2629-H-004 -001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review examines the specificity of sex/gender in arithmetic processing through a cognitive neuroscience approach, summarizing gender differences in mathematical learning behavioral performance and analyzing the role of MRI in understanding sex-specific effects. It also proposes potential research issues for further exploration of the sex effect using neuroimaging technology.
Over the long run, STEM fields had been perceived as dominant by males, despite that numerous studies have shown that female students do not underperform their male classmates in mathematics and science. In this review, we discuss whether and how sex/gender shows specificity in arithmetic processing using a cognitive neuroscience approach not only to capture contemporary differences in brain and behavior but also to provide exclusive brain bases knowledge that is unseen in behavioral outcomes alone. We begin by summarizing studies that had examined sex differences/similarities in behavioral performance of mathematical learning, with a specific focus on large-scale meta-analytical data. We then discuss how the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) approach can contribute to understanding neural mechanisms underlying sex-specific effects of mathematical learning by reviewing structural and functional data. Finally, we close this review by proposing potential research issues for further exploration of the sex effect using neuroimaging technology. Through the lens of advancement in the neuroimaging technique, we seek to provide insights into uncovering sex-specific neural mechanisms of learning to inform and achieve genuine gender equality in education.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据