4.5 Article

Quasi-Two-Dimensional Ferromagnetic SrRuO3 Grown by Pulsed Laser Deposition with Layer-by-Layer Growth Fashion

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS INTERFACES
卷 9, 期 30, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/admi.202201371

关键词

layer-by-layer growth mode; quasi-2D ferromagnetic monolayer; SrRuO; (3); superlattice

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11974325]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WK2030000035]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper demonstrates the persistent layer-by-layer growth of SrRuO3 thin films by regulating the growth conditions, achieving precise control of the thickness and construction of superlattices. By constructing SRO/STO superlattices, a quasi-2D ferromagnetic monolayer film is achieved. These results pave a path towards the synthesis of SRO heterostructures and properties control at an atomic scale.
One of the keys to the construction of metal oxide heterostructures is the short characteristic length scale, which requires controlled growth and interface engineering on an atomic level. At present, the growth mode of SrRuO3 (SRO) thin films grown on TiO2-terminated (001) SrTiO3 (STO) substrates usually transitions from 2D layer-by-layer to step-flow at the first few growth periods, which is not conducive to the construction of superlattices or multilayer films. In this paper, persistent layer-by-layer growth of SRO thin films is demonstrated by regulating the growth conditions. As a result, the thickness can be precisely controlled down to a single unit cell (u.c.) and achieve precise regulation of superlattices. Interestingly, the physical properties are well comparable to that of traditional step-flow mode and the critical thickness (t(c)) for the dead layer is only 3 u.c. Through constructing SRO/STO superlattices, the SRO layers become more conductive and a quasi-2D ferromagnetic monolayer film is achieved. The results pave a path toward SRO heterostructure synthesis and properties control at an atomic scale.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据