4.6 Article

Sawdust Amendment in Agricultural and Pasture Soils Can Reduce Iodine Losses

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 14, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su142013620

关键词

iodine losses; surface runoff; sawdust; charcoal; wood ash; lime; gypsum

资金

  1. Charles Darwin University, Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Iodine loss is a common issue in hilly regions, impacting the bioavailability of iodine in fruits and vegetables. This study found that sawdust as an organic amendment can effectively reduce iodine content in surface runoff and improve iodine retention capacity in soil.
Iodine loss is common in the soil of hilly regions due to higher precipitation rates and steeper slopes. Iodine deficiency in soil reduces iodine's bioavailability to fruits and vegetables and consequently may contribute to health complications. However, the iodine retention of soils after the addition of selected organic and inorganic amendments has not been studied. Therefore, a study was carried out to investigate iodine loss during surface runoff. For this purpose, a soil amendment (namely, sawdust, charcoal, wood ash, lime or gypsum) was applied separately to pasture and agricultural soils under natural rainfall conditions. The soil was fertigated with iodine in the form of potassium iodide (KI) at the rate of 200 ppm. Surface runoff was related to soil properties. Results showed that iodine content in surface runoff was linearly related with soil pH (R-2 = 0.89, p < 0.05) and inversely related with soil organic carbon (R-2 = -0.76, p < 0.05). Soils amended with sawdust had significantly reduced iodine content in runoff. A higher amount of iodine was lost via surface runoff from soil after inorganic amendment. Soil amendments were varied for iodine retention in soil in the order of sawdust > charcoal > wood ash > lime > gypsum. The study results indicated that organic amendments, especially sawdust, improved soil properties and increased the iodine retention capacity of soils.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据