4.6 Article

COVID-19 Impacts on Whale-Watching Collaboration Networks

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 14, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su142113846

关键词

COVID-19; coastal communities; natural resource governance; longitudinal network analysis; tourism management; wildlife tourism

资金

  1. CONACYT [I1200/94/2020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research evaluated the responses of whale-watching tourism stakeholders on the Mexican Pacific Coast to the impacts of COVID-19, identifying main reported impacts and harmful legacies, and providing important information for policy-making.
Whale-watching tourism generates high-income seasonal livelihoods in coastal communities on the Mexican Pacific Coast; however, this sector is at risk from accelerated global changes. We evaluated the responses of a collaboration of tourism networks regarding the impacts COVID-19 using a longitudinal social network approach. We used a two-wave snowball method to identify potential interviewees and followed geographic and jurisdictional criteria using a face-to-face survey to map collaboration ties between 38 stakeholders involved in whale-watching tourism before and after the second wave of the pandemic. We also asked this group of stakeholders about their perceived impacts of COVID-19. We found slightly higher connectivity and centralization levels in the social networks after the pandemic. Loss of income and reservations, a decrease in both conservations and pollution, and an increase in the reduction in wildlife tourism were the main self-reported impacts. We also detected harmful pandemic legacies, such as whale-watching tours conducted using unregulated private boats. This research directly informs Mexico's whale-watching tourism policy by showing the management and coordination challenges that stakeholders face in a post-pandemic context. While the social fabric of coastal communities has been resilient to the COVID-19 pandemic, we found indications that the governance of marine resources can easily unravel if rule of law is absent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据