4.6 Article

Searching for Novel Sustainability Initiatives in Amazonia

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 14, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su141610299

关键词

sustainable development; innovative solutions; bioeconomy; new business; horizon scanning

资金

  1. UKRI's Global Challenges Research Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study conducted interviews with practitioners in the Brazilian Amazon and identified a range of sustainability initiatives, including eco-business opportunities, territorial protection by grassroots movements, and novel coalitions promoting sustainability. However, most of these initiatives are still in the early stage and offer incremental rather than transformative development. Therefore, more efforts are needed to support the transformation towards sustainable and equitable development.
Amazonia is facing growing environmental pressures and deep social injustices that prompt questions about how sustainable development may emerge. This study sought novel sustainability initiatives in the Brazilian Amazon based on interviews conducted with diverse practitioners in 2021 using a horizon-scanning approach and snowball sampling for selecting interviewees, who then described the initiative most familiar to them. The interviews resulted in 50 described initiatives and 101 similar initiatives that were listed but not described. The results reveal the emergence of a range of sustainability initiatives, which we classify into seven types of new seeds of change ranging from eco-business opportunities, territorial protection by grassroots movements, and novel coalitions promoting sustainability. However, most of these new seeds are still being established and have a limited or uncertain potential for replication, and most offer only incremental rather than transformative development. Therefore, although these initiatives provide weak yet real signals for alternative futures, they also suggest that much more needs to be done to support the needed transformation toward sustainable and equitable development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据