4.6 Article

Performance of Equity Fund Investment Strategies in Poland

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 14, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su142013078

关键词

investment funds; fund profitability; fund performance; asset management; investment strategy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article examines investment strategy performance in equity funds domiciled in Poland using standard relative and absolute measures. The study finds that these funds may be attractive to conservative investors but are unattractive for riskier investors. The use of the Jensen ratio for evaluating absolute fund performance has limitations.
The modern development of the investment funds industry is underpinned by the understanding of the efficiency and quality of asset management regarding the use of various investment strategies. The purpose of the article is to examine investment strategy performance in equity funds domiciled in Poland using standard relative and absolute measures. The proposed method uses the Sharpe ratios, the Treynor ratio and the Jensen ratios. The research covers investment funds, spanning the period 2017-2021. The study (using the Sharpe and Traynor ratios) finds that the financial instruments for investment funds domiciled in Poland may be attractive to conservative investors, as they provide excessive returns compared to the returns of risk-free assets and inflation, but for riskier investors, most of the investment funds analyzed were unattractive (negative value of the returns of funds compared to stock indices). Absolute measures of fund performance, using the Jensen ratio, are limited for comparing all groups of investment strategies. A specific negative feature in the study of investment strategies based on the Jensen ratio is their inefficiency, that is, all statistically significant values of this ratio are negative. The management of ESG-funds with investments in the European financial market was more efficient than most conventional investment funds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据