4.6 Article

Assessing the Benefit Produced by Marine Protected Areas: The Case of Porto Cesareo Marine Protected Area (Italy)

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 14, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su141710698

关键词

environmental accounting; life cycle assessment; marine ecosystem service; indica-tors; cost benefit analysis; Porto Cesareo Marine Protected Area; CICES

资金

  1. Italian Ministry for Environment, Land and Sea Protection (MATTM) [00027472DNM 30/12/2016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article introduces an integrated environmental accounting model called 'eValue', applied in the Italian Marine Protected Areas to implement an environmental accounting system. The eValue model showed impressive results in terms of value generated in the Porto Cesareo MPA and the ratio of net benefit to public funding.
The article focuses on the integrated environmental accounting model called 'eValue', developed for protected areas and applied in the research programme coordinated by the Italian Ministry of the Environment and aimed at implementing an environmental accounting system for Italian Marine Protected Areas (MPAs). eValue adopts a cost-benefit analysis approach. Financial accounting based on costs and revenues is integrated with environmental accounting, which reflects environmental costs and environmental revenues, i.e., environmental benefits. The environ-mental costs assess the impacts related to human activities in the MPA expressed by calculating the carbon footprint and the environmental benefits of the marine ecosystem services calculated by applying monetary valuation techniques. The values thus estimated flow into the annual flow account, where the value produced (or consumed) by the MPA is estimated by difference. The eValue model was applied to the Porto Cesareo MPA (Italy). eValue showed that the annual benefit-cost ratio reaches a value of 3.4. Furthermore, the ratio of net benefit to public funding is 3.7, completely covering the number of public transfers and thus summarizing the MPA overall value for money.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据