4.6 Article

Development of Green Supermarket Evaluation Model Based on Green Process and Green Output-Case of Bangkok City

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 14, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su141710745

关键词

green supermarket; evaluation model development; green process; green output; green indicator

资金

  1. Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund for Research Unit, Chulalongkorn University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to develop a green supermarket evaluation model and provide empirical evidence on its relationship with the green process, green output, and green supermarket. The data included a survey of 190 supermarket branches in Bangkok, Thailand, and interviews with green supermarket management specialists. The findings revealed a three-level model with two elements, nine major indicators, and 101 sub-indicators for evaluating green supermarkets.
The study aimed to develop a green supermarket evaluation model based on a green process and green output to provide empirical evidence on the model's relationship with the green process, green output, and green supermarket. To this end, the study combined data from a survey of one store manager, one facility manager, and three assistant store managers from each of the 190 supermarket branches in Bangkok, Thailand with data from an in-depth interview of a sample group of green supermarket management specialists. The green supermarket evaluation model is divided into three levels, two elements (green process and green output), nine major indicators for green supermarket evaluation, and one hundred one sub-indicators for green supermarket evaluation, according to the findings. The five major indicators of the green process are green procurement, green storage, green service, green transportation and green environmental and energy management system, while the four major indicators of green output are social performance, environmental performance, economic performance, and organization image performance. In addition, the sub-indicator details were also identified for this evaluation model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据