4.6 Article

Bubble-Enhanced Mixing Induced by Standing Surface Acoustic Waves (SSAWs) in Microchannel

期刊

MICROMACHINES
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/mi13081337

关键词

surface acoustic wave; acoustic micromixing; bubbles; acoustic cavitation

资金

  1. Scientific Research Program of Shaanxi Provincial Education Department [18JK0379]
  2. Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi [2020JM-567]
  3. Shaanxi University Youth Innovation Team Project [20201020]
  4. Scientific Research Program for Youth Innovation Team Construction of Shaanxi Provincial Department of Education [21JP054]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes and experimentally demonstrates a method to enhance acoustic mixing by inducing bubbles through sound waves. The results show significant improvement in mixing efficiency after stimulating the bubbles. The study also highlights the harmful effects of temperature increase on microfluidic devices and temperature monitoring, emphasizing the need for regulation.
BAW-based micromixers usually achieve mixing enhancement with acoustic-induced bubbles, while SAW-based micromixers usually enhance mixing efficiency by varying the configuration of IDTs and microchannels. In this paper, bubble-enhanced acoustic mixing induced by standing surface acoustic waves (SSAWs) in a microchannel is proposed and experimentally demonstrated. Significant enhancement in the mixing efficiency was achieved after the bubbles were stimulated in our acoustofluidic microdevice. With an applied voltage of 5 V, 50 times amplified, the proposed mixing microdevice could achieve 90.8% mixing efficiency within 60 s at a flow rate of 240 mu L/h. The bubbles were generated from acoustic cavitation assisted by the temperature increase resulting from the viscous absorption of acoustic energy. Our results also suggest that a temperature increase is harmful to microfluidic devices and temperature monitoring. Regulation is essential, especially in chemical and biological applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据