4.5 Article

One-Dimensional Consolidation for Unsaturated Soils under Depth-Dependent Stress Induced by Multistage Load

期刊

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002457

关键词

Unsaturated soils; 1D consolidation; Semianalytical solutions; Depth-dependent stress; Multistage load; Differential operator method

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41630633, 41807232, 41877211, 51768041]
  2. National Key Research & Development Program of China [2019YFC1509800]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation-Funded Project [2018M640389]
  4. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Rail Infrastructure Durability and System Safety [R201904]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents semi-analytical solutions for the one-dimensional consolidation of unsaturated soils under depth-dependent stress. The correctness of the solutions is validated and the effects of depth-dependent stress on the consolidation properties of unsaturated ground are discussed through parameter studies.
This paper presents semianalytical solutions of one-dimensional (1D) consolidation for unsaturated soils with depth-dependent vertical stress induced by multistage load. Based on the 1D consolidation theory of unsaturated soils proposed by Fredlund and Hasan, semi-analytical solutions of excess pore pressures and settlement subjected to depth-dependent stress in a Laplace domain are derived by adopting Laplace transform and differential operator method. Then, the analytical solutions in time domain are obtained by Crump's method, and corresponding computing programs are compiled. The correctness of obtained solutions has been validated by comparing the current solutions in this paper with those under only time-dependent load in the existing paper. Finally, considering the two-stage load scheme, parametric studies are carried out to discuss the 1D consolidation properties for unsaturated ground under the depth-dependent stress. (C) 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据