4.7 Article

Quick detection of Carassius auratus herpesvirus (CaHV) by recombinase-aid amplification lateral flow dipstick (RAA-LFD) method

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.981911

关键词

carassius auratus herpesvirus (CaHV); tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR); recombinase-aid amplification; lateral flow dipstick; point-of-care testing (POCT)

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFD0900601, 2018YFD0900302]
  2. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [21ZR1427200]
  3. China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA [CARS-46]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study described a rapid and sensitive method for diagnosing carp herpesvirus, with high sensitivity and reliability and lower cost compared to traditional methods.
Crucian carp (Carassius auratus) is one of the major freshwater species and is also a common food fish in China. Recently, Carassius auratus herpesvirus (CaHV) could induce fatal viral disease with high mortality of crucian carp, which had caused huge economic losses. In this study, we described a rapid and simple recombinase-aid amplification (RAA) assay coupled with lateral flow dipstick (LFD), which could achieve sensitive diagnosis of tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) of CaHV within 35 min at 40 degrees C. Our RAA-LFD method had a satisfactory detection limit of 100 gene copies per reaction, which was 100-fold more sensitive than traditional PCR. In addition, no cross-reaction was observed with other viral pathogens, including koi herpesvirus (KHV), cyprinid herpesvirus 2 (CyHV-2), infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV), spring viremia of carp virus (SVCV) and grass carp reovirus (GCRV). Furthermore, the overall cost of the method was cut in half compared to previous studies. In conclusion, RAA-LFD assay is therefore, a promising alternative for point-of-care testing (POCT) of CaHV, which is feasible and of certain value in application of aquatic disease control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据