4.8 Article

Quantifying dynamic facial expressions under naturalistic conditions

期刊

ELIFE
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.79581

关键词

facial expression; major depressive disorder; naturalistic; Human

类别

资金

  1. Health Education and Training Institute Award in Psychiatry and Mental Health
  2. Rainbow Foundation
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council [1118153, 1095227, 10371296, GNT2013829]
  4. Australian Research Council [CE140100007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study uses machine vision and systems modeling to analyze dynamic facial expressions of people viewing emotionally salient film clips. The complexity of these expressions can be captured by a few simple spatiotemporal states, each representing a unique combination of facial actions with a distinct spectral fingerprint. This approach has potential applications in studying affective disorders and related mental illnesses.
Facial affect is expressed dynamically - a giggle, grimace, or an agitated frown. However, the characterisation of human affect has relied almost exclusively on static images. This approach cannot capture the nuances of human communication or support the naturalistic assessment of affective disorders. Using the latest in machine vision and systems modelling, we studied dynamic facial expressions of people viewing emotionally salient film clips. We found that the apparent complexity of dynamic facial expressions can be captured by a small number of simple spatiotemporal states - composites of distinct facial actions, each expressed with a unique spectral fingerprint. Sequential expression of these states is common across individuals viewing the same film stimuli but varies in those with the melancholic subtype of major depressive disorder. This approach provides a platform for translational research, capturing dynamic facial expressions under naturalistic conditions and enabling new quantitative tools for the study of affective disorders and related mental illnesses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据