4.8 Article

An international observational study to assess the impact of the Omicron variant emergence on the clinical epidemiology of COVID-19 in hospitalised patients

期刊

ELIFE
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

eLIFE SCIENCES PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.80556

关键词

COVID-19; Omicron; fatality; emergence; epidemiology; symptoms; Viruses

类别

资金

  1. UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO)
  2. Wellcome [215091/Z/18/Z, 222410/Z/21/Z, 225288/Z/22/Z, 222048/Z/20/Z]
  3. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1209135]
  4. University of Oxford's COVID--19 Research Response Fund
  5. Li Ka Shing Foundation
  6. Branco Weiss Fellowship
  7. Google.org
  8. Oxford Martin School
  9. Rockefeller Foundation
  10. European Union [874850]
  11. CIHR Coronavirus Rapid Research Funding Opportunity [OV2170359]
  12. foundation Bevordering Onderzoek Franciscus
  13. Italian Ministry of Health
  14. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) [CO--CIN--01]
  15. Medical Research Council (MRC) [MC_PC_19059]
  16. NIHR Health Protection Research Unit (HPRU) in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections at University of Liverpool
  17. Public Health England (PHE) [200907, 200927]
  18. NIHR HPRU in Respiratory Infections at Imperial College London
  19. Liverpool Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre [C18616/A25153]
  20. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Imperial College London [IS--BRC--1215--20013]
  21. Wellcome Trust [222410/Z/21/Z, 225288/Z/22/Z, 222048/Z/20/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes an innovative method to infer the SARS-CoV-2 variants responsible for clinical cases using publicly available population-level data. The analysis of over 100,000 patients from 28 countries suggests that patients hospitalized with Omicron variant infection less often present with commonly reported symptoms compared to patients infected with pre-Omicron variants. Furthermore, patients admitted to hospital after Omicron variant emergence had lower mortality compared to patients admitted during the period when Omicron variant was responsible for only a minority of infections.
Background: Whilst timely clinical characterisation of infections caused by novel SARS-CoV-2 variants is necessary for evidence-based policy response, individual-level data on infecting variants are typically only available for a minority of patients and settings. Methods: Here, we propose an innovative approach to study changes in COVID-19 hospital presentation and outcomes after the Omicron variant emergence using publicly available population-level data on variant relative frequency to infer SARS-CoV-2 variants likely responsible for clinical cases. We apply this method to data collected by a large international clinical consortium before and after the emergence of the Omicron variant in different countries. Results: Our analysis, that includes more than 100,000 patients from 28 countries, suggests that in many settings patients hospitalised with Omicron variant infection less often presented with commonly reported symptoms compared to patients infected with pre-Omicron variants. Patients with COVID-19 admitted to hospital after Omicron variant emergence had lower mortality compared to patients admitted during the period when Omicron variant was responsible for only a minority of infections (odds ratio in a mixed-effects logistic regression adjusted for likely confounders, 0.67 [95% confidence interval 0.61-0.75]). Qualitatively similar findings were observed in sensitivity analyses with different assumptions on population-level Omicron variant relative frequencies, and in analyses using available individual-level data on infecting variant for a subset of the study population. Conclusions: Although clinical studies with matching viral genomic information should remain a priority, our approach combining publicly available data on variant frequency and a multi-country clinical characterisation dataset with more than 100,000 records allowed analysis of data from a wide range of settings and novel insights on real-world heterogeneity of COVID-19 presentation and clinical outcome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据