4.4 Article

Electrical and Structural Properties of Two-Inch Diameter (0001) α-Ga2O3 Films Doped with Sn and Grown by Halide Epitaxy

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/2162-8777/ac9edb

关键词

-

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [19-19-00409]
  2. Department of the Defense, Defense Threat Reduction Agency [HDTRA1-20-2-0002]
  3. NSF [DMR 1856662]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two-inch diameter alpha-Ga2O3 films with a thickness of about 4 μm were successfully grown on basal plane sapphire using HVPE. The films were characterized using various techniques, revealing low dislocation densities, smooth surface, and varied sheet resistivity. Furthermore, the donor concentration and deep trap levels were also observed.
Two-inch diameter alpha-Ga2O3 films with thickness similar to 4 mu m were grown on basal plane sapphire by Halide Vapor Phase Epitaxy (HVPE) and doped with Sn in the top similar to 1 mu m from the surface. These films were characterized with High-Resolution X-ray Diffraction (HRXRD), Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) imaging in the Secondary Electron (SE) and Micro-cathodoluminescence (MCL) modes, contactless sheet resistivity mapping, capacitance-voltage, current-voltage, admittance spectra, and Deep Level Transient Spectroscopy (DLTS) measurements. The edge and screw dislocations densities estimated from HRXRD data were respectively 7.4 x 10(9 )cm(-2) and 1.5 x 10(7) cm(-2), while the films had a smooth surface with a low density (similar to 10(3 )cm(-2)) of circular openings with diameters between 10 and 100 mu m. The sheet resistivity of the films varied over the entire 2-inch diameter from 200 to 500 omega square(-1). The net donor concentration was similar to 10(18 )cm(-3) near the surface and increased to similar to 4 x 10(18) cm(-3) deeper inside the sample. The deep traps observed in admittance and DLTS spectra had levels at E-c-0.25 eV and E-c-0.35 eV, with concentration similar to 10(15 )cm(-3) and E-c-1 eV with concentration similar to 10(16 )cm(-3).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据