4.6 Article

Calculation of Resonance Raman Spectra and Excited State Properties for Blue Copper Protein Model Complexes

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 10, 期 44, 页码 14614-14623

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c04802

关键词

Laccase; TDDFT; charge transfer; absorption; and Raman spectra

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF)
  2. [CBET- 1922956]
  3. [CBET-1921075]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the properties of T1 site mimics of laccase enzymes using resonance Raman spectroscopy and time dependent density functional theory calculations, providing a foundation for the development of sustainable technologies.
Laccase enzymes have been investigated for their potential as ecofriendly biofuel cell cathode catalysts. In these applications, electrons transfer from the electrode directly to the so-called Type 1 (T1) redox site within the enzyme. Over the years, resonance Raman (RR) spectroscopy has been utilized to probe the nature of ligand interactions with the Cu2+ center at the T1 site of the resting, oxidized form of laccases and related blue copper proteins. Spectral interpretation has been guided by parallel studies of small molecule T1 site mimics. Reported herein are results of time dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) calculations performed on a series of experimentally well-studied T1 site mimics based on Cu2+ thiolate complexes stabilized by either a tridentate tris(pyrazolyl)hydroborate ligand or a bidentate beta-diketiminate ligand. Vertical excitation energies were computed for the first 10 doublet states of each complex. The electronic absorption and RR spectra derived show excellent agreement with the experiment. RR spectra were dominated by a strong Cu-S stretching transition near 400 cm-1, which is sensitive to molecular conformation within the thiolate ligand. The results provide a foundation to build from in advancing models of laccase catalytic active sites in support of sustainable technologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据