4.6 Article

Evaluation of Hydrological Rainfall Loss Methods Using Small-Scale Physical Landslide Model

期刊

WATER
卷 14, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w14172726

关键词

landslides; lab experiment; hydrology; infiltration; rainfall loss; surface runoff; temporal dynamics; HEC-HMS; model evaluation

资金

  1. Croatian Science Foundation [IP-2018-01-1503]
  2. Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS) [P2-0180, V2-2137]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the performance of several hydrological rainfall loss methods in reproducing experimental results. The results indicate that multiple rainfall loss methods should be tested and evaluated to select the most suitable method in natural environments with heterogeneous soil characteristics.
An adequate representation of the relationship between effective rainfall and rainfall losses is required in hydrological rainfall-runoff models to reduce the uncertainty of the modelling results. This study evaluates the performance of several hydrological rainfall loss methods using the experimental data obtained from a laboratory small-scale physical landslide model with variable slope inclination, homogenous material and no vegetation effects. Three different experiments were selected and five rainfall loss methods were tested to evaluate their performance in reproducing the experimental results from the perspective of the surface runoff formation on the experimental slope. Initial and calibrated parameters were used to test the performance of these hydrological rainfall loss methods. The results indicate that the initial parameters of the rainfall loss model can satisfactorily reproduce the experimental results in some cases. Despite the fact that the slope material characteristics used in the laboratory experiments were relatively homogenous, some well-known methods yielded inaccurate results. Hence, calibration of the rainfall loss model proved to be essential. It should also be noted that, in some cases, the calibrated model parameters were relatively different from the initial model parameters estimated from the literature. None of the tested hydrological rainfall loss methods proved to be superior to the others. Therefore, in the case of natural environments with heterogeneous soil characteristics, multiple rainfall loss methods should be tested and the most suitable method should be selected only after cross-validation or a similar evaluation of the tested methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据