4.6 Article

Identification of Suitable Sites Using GIS for Rainwater Harvesting Structures to Meet Irrigation Demand

期刊

WATER
卷 14, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w14213480

关键词

GIS; multi-criteria decision analysis; rainwater harvesting; site suitability; Sydney

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study uses GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis to identify suitable sites for rainwater harvesting in Greater Western Sydney region. The results show that 9% of the study area is very highly suitable, 25% is highly suitable, 36% is moderately suitable, 21% is of low suitability, and 9% is unsuitable. The findings of this research are important for promoting rainwater harvesting in this region to meet irrigation demand.
This study uses a multi-criteria decision analysis approach based on geographic information system (GIS) to identify suitable sites for rainwater harvesting (RWH) structures (such as farm dam, check dam and contour bund) to meet irrigation demand in Greater Western Sydney region, New South Wales, Australia. Data on satellite image, soil, climate, and digital elevation model (DEM) were stored in GIS layers and merged to create a ranking system, which were then used to identify suitable RWH (rainwater harvesting) areas. The resulting thematic layers (such as rainfall, land use/land cover, soil type, slope, runoff depth, drainage density, stream order and distance from road) were combined into one overlay to produce map of RWH suitability. The results showed that 9% of the study region is 'very highly suitable' and 25% is 'highly suitable'. On the other hand, 36% of the area, distributed in the north-west, west and south-west of the study region, is 'moderately suitable'. While 21% of the region, distributed in east and south-east part of the region, has 'low suitability' and 9% is found as 'unsuitable area'. The findings of this research will contribute towards wider adoption of RWH in Greater Western Sydney region to meet irrigation demand. The developed methodology can be adapted to any other region/country.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据