4.6 Article

Thermally Enhanced Biodegradation of TCE in Groundwater

期刊

WATER
卷 14, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w14213456

关键词

dechlorination; thermal treatment; chlorinated ethenes; TCE; Dehalococcoides

资金

  1. Technology Agency of the Czech Republic [TH01031225, FW03010071]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the degradation of TCE was investigated using various methods, including monitoring changes in dechlorinating bacteria, observing functional genes and specific bacteria, and analyzing the effects of elevated temperature and whey addition. The results showed that elevated temperature and whey addition significantly enhanced TCE dechlorination. This study demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness of biological dechlorination of TCE with elevated temperature and whey addition.
In situ remediation is usually restricted by temperature, lack of substrate for reductive dechlorination (anaerobic respiration), the presence of dehalogenating microorganisms, and specific bedrock conditions. In this work, trichloroethene (TCE) degradation was studied by a number of methods, from physical-chemical analyses to molecular biological tools. The abundance changes in dechlorinating bacteria were monitored using real-time PCR. The functional genes vcrA and bvcA as well as the 16S rRNA specific for representatives of genera Dehalococcoides, Dehalobacter, and Desulfitobacterium were monitored. Furthermore, the sulfate-reducing bacteria and denitrifying bacteria were observed by amplifying the functional genes apsA and nirK. The elevated temperature and the substrate (whey) addition significantly affected TCE dechlorination. The chlorine index decreased after nine weeks from 2.5 to 0.1 at 22 degrees C, to 1.1 at 17 degrees C and 1.7 at 12 degrees C and complete dechlorination was achieved at 22 degrees C with whey addition. The achieved results of this work show the feasibility and effectiveness of biological dechlorination of TCE enhanced with elevated temperature and whey addition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据