4.7 Article

Electronic Nose for the Rapid Detection of Deoxynivalenol in Wheat Using Classification and Regression Trees

期刊

TOXINS
卷 14, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxins14090617

关键词

e-nose; Fusarium graminearum; mycotoxin; machine learning; small grains; metal oxide sensors; DON

资金

  1. PSR program Gruppi operativi del PEI per la produttivita e le sostenibilita dell'agricoltura Sottomisura 16.1 of Emilia Romagna Region, Focus Area 2A [16.1.01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed the potential use of an electronic nose combined with CART to quickly distinguish between compliant and DON-contaminated wheat lots. The results showed that this method can be an effective and fast way to identify samples with DON contamination.
Mycotoxin represents a significant concern for the safety of food and feed products, and wheat represents one of the most susceptible crops. To manage this issue, fast, reliable, and low-cost test methods are needed for regulated mycotoxins. This study aimed to assess the potential use of the electronic nose for the early identification of wheat samples contaminated with deoxynivalenol (DON) above a fixed threshold. A total of 214 wheat samples were collected from commercial fields in northern Italy during the periods 2014-2015 and 2017-2018 and analyzed for DON contamination with a conventional method (GC-MS) and using a portable e-nose AIR PEN 3 (Airsense Analytics GmbH, Schwerin, Germany), equipped with 10 metal oxide sensors for different categories of volatile substances. The Machine Learning approach Classification and regression trees (CART) was used to categorize samples according to four DON contamination thresholds (1750, 1250, 750, and 500 mu g/kg). Overall, this process yielded an accuracy of >83% (correct prediction of DON levels in wheat samples). These findings suggest that the e-nose combined with CART can be an effective quick method to distinguish between compliant and DON-contaminated wheat lots. Further validation including more samples above the legal limits is desirable before concluding the validity of the method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据