4.7 Article

Forest Height Retrieval Based on the Dual PolInSAR Images

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 14, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs14184503

关键词

dual polarimetric SAR data; forest height; lexicographic vector; optimization; polarimetric interferometric SAR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new algorithm for forest height estimation based on dual polarimetric interferometric SAR data is proposed in this study. The efficiency of dual-polarization data compared to full polarimetric images for forest height retrieval is considered. The algorithm uses a three-stage method and an exhaustive search polarization optimization technique to improve the results. Experimental results show the high accuracy of dual PolInSAR data for forest height estimation.
A new algorithm for forest height estimation based on dual polarimetric interferometric SAR data is presented in this study. The main objective is to consider the efficiency of the dual-polarization data compared to the full polarimetric images with respect to forest height retrieval. Accordingly, the forest height estimation based on the random volume over the ground model is examined using a geometrical procedure named the three-stage method. An exhaustive search polarization optimization technique is also applied to improve the results by employing the efficiency of all the polarization bases based on the four-dimensional lexicographic PolInSAR vector. The repeat-pass experimental SAR (ESAR) images, which include both L- and P-band full polarimetric data, are employed for the accuracy assessment of the dual PolInSAR data and the newly proposed method for forest height estimation. The experimental results on the L-band PolInSAR data show the ability of the dual PolInSAR data for forest height estimation with an average root mean square error (RMSE) of 4.97 m against Lidar data based on the conventional three-stage method. Additionally, the proposed method results in an accuracy of 2.95 m for forest height estimation, indicating its high potential for tree height retrieval.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据