4.7 Article

Multispectral and Hyperspectral Image Fusion Based on Regularized Coupled Non-Negative Block-Term Tensor Decomposition

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 14, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs14215306

关键词

image fusion; block-term tensor decomposition; total variation (TV); tensor decomposition

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Ningxia Province of China [2021AAC03179]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62201438]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a new algorithm for multispectral and hyperspectral image fusion, which estimates high spatial resolution hyperspectral images using a coupled non-negative block-term tensor model and introduces total variation (TV). Experiments show that the performance of this method is better than the state-of-the-art methods.
The problem of multispectral and hyperspectral image fusion (MHF) is to reconstruct images by fusing the spatial information of multispectral images and the spectral information of hyperspectral images. Focusing on the problem that the hyperspectral canonical polyadic decomposition model and the Tucker model cannot introduce the physical interpretation of the latent factors into the framework, it is difficult to use the known properties and abundance of endmembers to generate high-quality fusion images. This paper proposes a new fusion algorithm. In this paper, a coupled non-negative block-term tensor model is used to estimate the ideal high spatial resolution hyperspectral images, its sparsity is characterized by adding 1-norm, and total variation (TV) is introduced to describe piecewise smoothness. Secondly, the different operators in two directions are defined and introduced to characterize their piecewise smoothness. Finally, the proximal alternating optimization (PAO) algorithm and the alternating multiplier method (ADMM) are used to iteratively solve the model. Experiments on two standard datasets and two local datasets show that the performance of this method is better than the state-of-the-art methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据