4.7 Article

Estimate the Earliest Phenophase for Garlic Mapping Using Time Series Landsat 8/9 Images

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 14, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs14184476

关键词

early-season; garlic identification; phenology; Landsat 8; 9; separability

资金

  1. Henan Provincial Department of Science and Technology Research Project [212102310019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Timely and accurate identification and mapping of garlic are crucial for garlic yield prediction and market management. This study determined the optimal identification strategy and earliest identifiable phenophase for garlic using Landsat 8/9 time series imagery. The generated early-season garlic distribution map provides timely data support for various stakeholders.
Garlic is the major economic crop in China. Timely and accurate identification and mapping of garlic are significant for garlic yield prediction and garlic market management. Previous studies on garlic mapping were mainly based on all observations of the entire growing season, so the resulting maps have a hysteresis. Here, we determined the optimal identification strategy and the earliest identifiable phenophase for garlic based on all available Landsat 8/9 time series imagery in Google Earth Engine. Specifically, we evaluated the performance of different vegetation indices for each phenophase to determine the optimal classification metrics for garlic. Secondly, we identified garlic using random forest algorithm and classification metrics of different time series lengths. Finally, we determined the earliest identifiable phenophase of garlic and generated an early-season garlic distribution map. Garlic could be identified as early as March (bud differentiation period) with an F1 of 0.91. Our study demonstrates the differences in the performance of vegetation indices at different phenophases, and these differences provide a new idea for mapping crops. The generated early-season garlic distribution map provides timely data support for various stakeholders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据