4.7 Article

Underwater Image Restoration via Contrastive Learning and a Real-World Dataset

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 14, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs14174297

关键词

underwater image restoration; underwater image enhancement; underwater image dataset; image restoration

资金

  1. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) [AIM FSP_TB07_WP05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Underwater image restoration is important for unveiling the underwater world. To support the development of new deep-learning based methods, we constructed a large-scale real underwater image dataset and proposed a method based on an unsupervised image-to-image translation framework.
Underwater image restoration is of significant importance in unveiling the underwater world. Numerous techniques and algorithms have been developed in recent decades. However, due to fundamental difficulties associated with imaging/sensing, lighting, and refractive geometric distortions in capturing clear underwater images, no comprehensive evaluations have been conducted with regard to underwater image restoration. To address this gap, we constructed a large-scale real underwater image dataset, dubbed Heron Island Coral Reef Dataset ('HICRD'), for the purpose of benchmarking existing methods and supporting the development of new deep-learning based methods. We employed an accurate water parameter (diffuse attenuation coefficient) to generate the reference images. There are 2000 reference restored images and 6003 original underwater images in the unpaired training set. Furthermore, we present a novel method for underwater image restoration based on an unsupervised image-to-image translation framework. Our proposed method leveraged contrastive learning and generative adversarial networks to maximize the mutual information between raw and restored images. Extensive experiments with comparisons to recent approaches further demonstrate the superiority of our proposed method. Our code and dataset are both publicly available.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据