4.2 Review

Erectile dysfunction, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor use and risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality in people with diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

PRIMARY CARE DIABETES
卷 16, 期 5, 页码 601-613

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pcd.2022.09.004

关键词

Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors; Erectile dysfunction; Diabetes mellitus; Cardiovascular disease; Mortality; Systematic review; Meta-analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the impact of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) on cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality risk in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and erectile dysfunction (ED). The results showed that ED was associated with an increased risk of composite CVD/MACE, all-cause mortality, coronary heart disease (CHD), and stroke in the general population. However, in the DM population, ED did not confer an excess risk of CVD and mortality compared to those without DM. Limited data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indicated no significant differences in the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), CHD, and all-cause mortality between PDE5-I use and non-use in patients with ED and DM.
Background: Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is), used in the management of erectile dysfunction (ED), have potential cardioprotective benefits. The impact of PDE5-Is on reducing adverse cardiovascular outcomes in pa-tients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and ED is uncertain. Using a systematic review and meta-analysis of obser-vational cohort studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs), we evaluated if (i) the association of PDE5-Is in people with ED and DM and their risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality and (ii) ED confers an excess risk of CVD and mortality in patients with DM compared with no DM.Methods: Studies were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science citation search and search of bibliographies to April 2022. Study-specific risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled.Results: Eighteen unique studies reported on the cardiovascular impact of ED in patients with and without DM. In the general population, the RRs (95% CIs) of ED for composite CVD/MACE, all-cause mortality, CHD and stroke were 1.43 (1.31-1.55), 1.47 (1.31-1.65), 1.59 (1.39-1.82), and 1.34 (1.15-1.56), respectively. The respective estimates were 1.68 (1.15-2.45), 1.40 (0.90-2.18), 1.41 (1.24-1.61) and 1.32 (1.09-1.60) in the diabetes population. Interaction analyses suggested similar risk in both populations. Six studies reported the cardiovas-cular effects of PDE5-Is in people with ED and DM. Limited RCT data showed no significant differences in the risk of major adverse cardiac event (MACE), coronary heart disease (CHD) and all-cause mortality comparing PDE5-I use with non-use: RRs (95% CIs) of 3.47 (0.17-69.19), 1.31 (0.10-16.54) and 0.35 (0.12-1.05), respectively.Conclusions: ED confers no excess risk of CVD and mortality in patients with DM compared with no DM. Limited and inadequately powered data shows no significant differences in the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes comparing use of PDE5-Is with non-use in patients with ED and DM. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42022324537

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据