4.7 Review

Electrospun Nanofiber Composites for Drug Delivery: A Review on Current Progresses

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 14, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym14183725

关键词

electrospinning; nanofiber; drug delivery; drug release; nanofiber composite

资金

  1. Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia [FRGS/1/2020/STG02/UPM/02/13 (01-01-20-2223FR/5540355)]
  2. Geran Penyelidikan MyRA Lepasan PhD [600RMC/GM LPHD 5/3 (128/2021)]
  3. UTM Fundamental Research grant [Q.J130000.3851.21H75]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrospinning is a promising method for creating nanofiber membranes that can release drugs over time. These nanofiber composites have a large surface area to volume ratio, which aids in cell binding, drug loading, and mass transfer processes.
A medication's approximate release profile should be sustained in order to generate the desired therapeutic effect. The drug's release site, duration, and rate must all be adjusted to the drug's therapeutic aim. However, when designing drug delivery systems, this may be a considerable hurdle. Electrospinning is a promising method of creating a nanofibrous membrane since it enables drugs to be placed in the nanofiber composite and released over time. Nanofiber composites designed through electrospinning for drug release purposes are commonly constructed of simple structures. This nanofiber composite produces matrices with nanoscale fiber structure, large surface area to volume ratio, and a high porosity with small pore size. The nanofiber composite's large surface area to volume ratio can aid with cell binding and multiplication, drug loading, and mass transfer processes. The nanofiber composite acts as a container for drugs that can be customized to a wide range of drug release kinetics. Drugs may be electrospun after being dissolved or dispersed in the polymer solution, or they can be physically or chemically bound to the nanofiber surface. The composition and internal structure of the nanofibers are crucial for medicine release patterns.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据