4.6 Article

A spatially resolved stochastic model reveals the role of supercoiling in transcription regulation

期刊

PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
卷 18, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009788

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [MCB2105837]
  2. National Institutes of Health [5T32GM007231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a transcription supercoiling model that describes the interaction between RNA polymerase activity and local DNA supercoiling, and how this controls transcription. The model revealed the cooperative effect of supercoiling in highly expressed genes during co-transcription, and the importance of relative gene orientation in transcription regulation. It provides a quantitative platform for investigating the impact of genome organization on transcription.
In Escherichia coli, translocation of RNA polymerase (RNAP) during transcription introduces supercoiling to DNA, which influences the initiation and elongation behaviors of RNAP. To quantify the role of supercoiling in transcription regulation, we developed a spatially resolved supercoiling model of transcription. The integrated model describes how RNAP activity feeds back with the local DNA supercoiling and how this mechanochemical feedback controls transcription, subject to topoisomerase activities and stochastic topological domain formation. This model establishes that transcription-induced supercoiling mediates the cooperation of co-transcribing RNAP molecules in highly expressed genes, and this cooperation is achieved under moderate supercoiling diffusion and high topoisomerase unbinding rates. It predicts that a topological domain could serve as a transcription regulator, generating substantial transcriptional noise. It also shows the relative orientation of two closely arranged genes plays an important role in regulating their transcription. The model provides a quantitative platform for investigating how genome organization impacts transcription.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据