4.7 Article

Importance of Standardizing Analytical Characterization Methodology for Improved Reliability of the Nanomedicine Literature

期刊

NANO-MICRO LETTERS
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s40820-022-00922-5

关键词

Characterization; Nanomedicine; Standard protocols; Reproducibility; Nanomedicine devices

资金

  1. U.S. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [DK131417]
  2. Burroughs Wellcome Fund Career Award at the Scientific Interface (CASI)
  3. Dreyfus foundation award
  4. Philomathia foundation
  5. NIH MIRA award [R35GM128922]
  6. NIH R21 NIDA award [1R03DA052810]
  7. NSF CAREER award [2046159]
  8. NSF CBET award [1733575]
  9. Sloan Foundation Award
  10. USDA BBT EAGER award
  11. Moore Foundation Award
  12. DOE office of Science [DE-SC0020366]
  13. Fulbright fellowship
  14. CZI imaging award
  15. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0020366] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  16. Directorate For Engineering [1733575, 2046159] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  17. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [2046159, 1733575] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the interaction between biological structures and nanoscale technologies is crucial for the development of safe and efficient nanomedicine products. However, the lack of a universal reporting system and standardized methods for nanomaterial characterization has resulted in low reliability and reproducibility in nanomedicine literature. It is necessary to establish a characterization system to support reproducibility of nanoscience data, especially for studies seeking clinical translation. Implementation of standard protocols in experimental laboratories requires long-term planning and collaboration among stakeholders.
Understanding the interaction between biological structures and nanoscale technologies, dubbed the nano-bio interface, is required for successful development of safe and efficient nanomedicine products. The lack of a universal reporting system and decentralized methodologies for nanomaterial characterization have resulted in a low degree of reliability and reproducibility in the nanomedicine literature. As such, there is a strong need to establish a characterization system to support the reproducibility of nanoscience data particularly for studies seeking clinical translation. Here, we discuss the existing key standards for addressing robust characterization of nanomaterials based on their intended use in medical devices or as pharmaceuticals. We also discuss the challenges surrounding implementation of such standard protocols and their implication for translation of nanotechnology into clinical practice. We, however, emphasize that practical implementation of standard protocols in experimental laboratories requires long-term planning through integration of stakeholders including institutions and funding agencies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据