4.1 Review

Social Prescribing: Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Psychosocial Community Referral Interventions in Primary Care

期刊

出版社

UBIQUITY PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.5334/ijic.6472

关键词

social prescribing; community referral intervention; systematic review; integrated care

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) [01EL2027A, 01EL2027B]
  2. Open Access Publication Fund of Charite -Universitatsmedizin Berlin
  3. German Research Foundation (DFG)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Social prescribing interventions have shown positive effects on a variety of endpoints in the short term, but the evidence is limited for long-term and controlled settings. Further methodologically rigorous controlled trials are needed to determine clinical relevance and sustainability.
Introduction: Social prescribing (SP) aims to provide targeted psychosocial support and close the gap between medical and non-medical services. This review assesses the effectiveness of community-based SP interventions. Methods: We performed a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of interventional studies of community referral interventions focused on facilitating psychosocial support. We considered health-related endpoints, other patient reported outcomes, or health care utilization. Six databases, grey literature, and additional trials registers were searched. Results were screened in a two-step process, followed by data extraction, each by two independent reviewers. If data permitted such, effect sizes were calculated. Risk of bias was assessed with the EPHPP and the Cochrane RoB2 tools. Results: We identified 68 reports from 53 different projects, three were controlled studies. Uncontrolled studies with shorter time frames frequently reported positive effects. This could largely not be seen in controlled settings and for longer follow-up periods. Designs, populations, and outcomes evaluated were heterogeneous with high risk of bias for most studies. Discussion and conclusion: Current evidence suggests positive effects of SP on a variety of relevant endpoints. Due to quality deficits in the available studies, scope for conclusions concerning clinical relevance and sustainability is limited. Further methodologically rigorous controlled trials are needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据