4.3 Article

Patients' Health Experiences of Post COVID-19 Condition-A Qualitative Study

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192113980

关键词

COVID-19; experience; health; lifestyle; long-term symptoms

资金

  1. Region Halland Research Council [HALLAND-965985]
  2. Foundation of Sparbanken Varberg [HALLAND-967873]
  3. Knowledge foundation [Dnr-280042]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to explore patients' health experiences of post COVID-19 condition. Data collection was conducted through 14 semi-structured interviews, and the findings showed that patients experienced symptoms of varying duration and their health experiences ranged from uncertainty to new insights. The study identified loss of abilities, loss of control, and revaluation of life as key themes among patients with post COVID-19 condition.
Patients who suffer from long-term symptoms of COVID-19, described as post COVID-19 condition, are a new and large group of patients. There is a lack of knowledge concerning health experiences in this patient group. The aim of this study was to explore patients' health experiences of post COVID-19 condition. Data collection was performed through 14 semi-structured interviews. The qualitative content analysis resulted in six sub-categories, three categories, and an overall theme. Patients experienced symptoms of varying duration-ranging from 5-21 months. The results showed that patients' health experiences of post COVID-19 condition moved between uncertainty and new insights. This was shown by patients experiencing: (1) loss of abilities, including losing smell and taste and lacking energy, (2) loss of control, including being foreign to oneself and seeking answers, and (3) revaluation of life, including accepting the transformed body and prioritizing health. This study illustrates that patients living with post COVID-19 condition need to be treated with flexibility, based on each individual's unique challenges and experiences of the symptoms and the consequences for their health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据