4.8 Article

Metal (Ni, Co)-Metal Oxides/Graphene Nanocomposites as Multifunctional Electrocatalysts

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 25, 期 36, 页码 5799-5808

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201502217

关键词

-

资金

  1. next generation secondary battery R&D program of MKE/KEIT [10042575]
  2. startup fund of University at Buffalo, SUNY
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Fuel Cell Technologies Office (FCTO) Incubator Program [DE-EE0006960]
  4. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [10042575] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) along with hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) have been considered critical processes for electrochemical energy conversion and storage through metal-air battery, fuel cell, and water electrolyzer technologies. Here, a new class of multifunctional electrocatalysts consisting of dominant metallic Ni or Co with small fraction of their oxides anchored onto nitrogen-doped reduced graphene oxide (rGO) including Co-CoO/N-rGO and Ni-NiO/N-rGO are prepared via a pyrolysis of graphene oxide and cobalt or nickel salts. Ni-NiO/N-rGO shows the higher electrocatalytic activity for the OER in 0.1 M KOH with a low overpotential of 0.24 V at a current density of 10 mA cm(-2), which is superior to that of the commercial IrO2. In addition, it exhibits remarkable activity for the HER, demonstrating a low overpotential of 0.16 V at a current density of 20 mA cm(-2) in 1.0 M KOH. Apart from similar HER activity to the Ni-based catalyst, Co-CoO/N-rGO displays the higher activity for the ORR, comparable to Pt/C in zinc-air batteries. This work provides a new avenue for the development of multifunctional electrocatalysts with optimal catalytic activity by varying transition metals (Ni or Co) for these highly demanded electrochemical energy technologies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据