4.6 Article

In vivo imaging of tau deposition in Alzheimer's disease using both [18F]-THK5317 and [18F]-S16: A pilot human study

期刊

FRONTIERS IN AGING NEUROSCIENCE
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.994750

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; tau tangles; positron emission tomography; [F-18]; THK5317

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the effectiveness of a new tracer, [F-18]-S16, in distinguishing patients with AD from HCs. The results show that [F-18]-S16 exhibits increased cortical uptake in AD patients, suggesting its potential for in vivo detection of tau protein.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of a new tracer (S)-1-(4-(6-(dimethylamino)quinoxalin-2-yl)phenoxy)-3-fluoropropan-2-ol ([F-18]-S16), in distinguishing patients with AD from HCs. MethodsPaired [F-18]-S16 and [F-18]-THK5317 scans were acquired in five patients with AD, six HCs, one subject with a semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia (sv-PPA) and one subject with probable progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). Dynamic PET scanning was performed over 90 min after injection of the tracers. Standardized uptake values (SUV) and cortical-to-cerebellum standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) were used for tau deposition semi-quantization. A voxel-based analysis was employed to assess the uptake difference between populations. Results[F-18]-S16 exhibited excellent blood-brain-barrier penetration. AD patients showed increased cortical [F-18]-THK5317 and [F-18]-S16 binding. Compared to HCs, AD patients showed significantly increased cortical [F-18]-S16 uptake in the bilateral occipital cortex, posterior cingulated cortex/precuneus, and lateral frontal cortex. Notable [F-18]-S16 uptake was observed in the basal ganglia and brainstem compared to the neocortex. A substantial [F-18]-S16 signal was detected in the basal ganglia and midbrain in a patient with probable PSP and in the bilateral anterior temporal cortex in a sv-PPA patient. Conclusion[F-18]-S16 might be of help to detect tau protein in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据