4.7 Article

Ownership, Governance, Uses, and Ecosystem Services of Community Forests in the Eastern United States

期刊

FORESTS
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/f13101577

关键词

community forests; Eastern United States; recreation; ecosystem services; governance; public participation

类别

资金

  1. North Carolina State University Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources Zobel and Laarman Endowments
  2. North Carolina State University Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources Zobel and Laarman Endowments.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Community forests (CFs) have been established across the globe to meet various needs. This study explores CFs in the U.S. and their benefits, such as cultural and regulating services. The research sheds lights on CF characteristics and identifies potential opportunities for the future.
Over time, community forests (CFs) have been established across the globe to meet various social, economic, and ecological needs. Benefits of CFs include conserving resilient forests and natural resources and ecosystem services, enhancing social and economic capital, and leveraging local and indigenous knowledge in forest and natural resource management and decision-making. Research on CFs in the U.S. is quite limited, and cases that have been assessed show a wide spectrum in terms of CF ownership, organizational structure, governance, property rights, and uses. Through an exploratory research approach, this study enhances the understanding of the characteristics of CFs in the U.S. and the ecosystem services and other benefits that they provide. Through online web searches, we compiled one of the first comprehensive lists of CFs in the Eastern U.S. Prior to this study, there was no publicly available comprehensive database or list of CFs in the country. Subsequently, we conducted comparative case study research, which included semi-structured in-person interviews with key stakeholders from four CFs in the Eastern U.S. to understand CF ownership, governance, uses, and benefits. CFs benefits frequently included cultural services, such as recreation and education, and regulating and supporting services, such as water quality and wildlife habitat. Much less common was a focus on provisioning services such as timber or non-timber forest products. Maintaining collaboration and funding for CF efforts in the long run without significant CF revenues remains a challenge for most forests. Overall, this research sheds lights on CF characteristics and capacities in the Eastern U.S. and identifies potential opportunities and needs for the U.S. in the future. CFs researchers, managers, and community members.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据