4.7 Article

Remote Sensing Estimation of Forest Aboveground Biomass Based on Lasso-SVR

期刊

FORESTS
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/f13101597

关键词

aboveground biomass; remote sensing estimation; Lasso algorithm; support vector regression model

类别

资金

  1. Science and Technology Innovation Platform and Talent Plan Project of Hunan Province [2017TP1022]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China Youth Project [32201552]
  3. Philosophy and Social Science Foundation Youth Project of Hunan Province [21YBQ054]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study uses the Lasso algorithm and support vector regression (SVR) model to estimate the aboveground biomass of the Lutou Forest Farm. The results show that the model can explain 73% of the aboveground biomass with high precision.
With the Lutou Forest Farm as the research area, the Lasso algorithm was used for characteristic selection, and the optimal combination of variables was input into the support vector regression (SVR) model. The most suitable SVR model was selected to estimate the aboveground biomass of the forest through the comparison of the kernel function and optimal parameters, and the spatial distribution map of the aboveground biomass in the study area was drawn. The significance analysis of special variables showed good correlations between forest aboveground biomass and each vegetation index. There was a more significant correlation with some remote sensing bands, a less significant correlation with some texture features, and a strong correlation with DEM in the terrain features. When the parameters C is 2 and g is 0.01, the SVR model has the highest precision, which can illustrate 73% of the forest aboveground biomass, with the validation set R-2 being 0.62. The statistical analysis of the results shows that the total aboveground biomass of the Lutou Forest Farm is 4.82x10(5) t. The combination of Lasso with the SVR model can improve the estimation accuracy of forest aboveground biomass, and the model has a strong generalization ability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据