4.8 Article

DEPDC5-dependent mTORC1 signaling mechanisms are critical for the anti-seizure effects of acute fasting

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 40, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111278

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [1K08NS107637, 1R35CA197532, 1PO1AG049665]
  2. Hearst Foundation
  3. Boston Children's Hospital Translational Research Program
  4. Boston Children's Office of Faculty Development Career Development Fellowship
  5. BCH/Harvard Medical School Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center [NIH P50HD105351]
  6. Northwestern University Pulmonary and Critical Care Department
  7. BCH Rosamund Stone Zander Translational Neuroscience Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acute fasting can reduce seizure susceptibility in a DEPDC5-dependent manner through modulation of mTORC1 signaling and amino acid levels, suggesting a rational therapeutic strategy for epilepsy treatment.
Caloric restriction and acute fasting are known to reduce seizures but through unclear mechanisms. mTOR signaling has been suggested as a potential mechanism for seizure protection from fasting. We demonstrate that brain mTORC1 signaling is reduced after acute fasting of mice and that neuronal mTORC1 integrates GATOR1 complex-mediated amino acid and tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)-mediated growth factor signaling. Neuronal mTORC1 is most sensitive to withdrawal of leucine, arginine, and glutamine, which are dependent on DEPDC5, a component of the GATOR1 complex. Metabolomic analysis reveals that Depdc5 neuronal-specific knockout mice are resistant to sensing significant fluctuations in brain amino acid levels after fasting. Depdc5 neuronal-specific knockout mice are resistant to the protective effects of fasting on seizures or seizure-induced death. These results establish that acute fasting reduces seizure susceptibility in a DEPDC5-dependent manner. Modulation of nutrients upstream of GATOR1 and mTORC1 could offer a rational therapeutic strategy for epilepsy treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据