4.8 Article

Temporal analysis suggests a reciprocal relationship between 3D chromatin structure and transcription

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 41, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111567

关键词

-

资金

  1. North Carolina Biotechnology Center Institute Development Program [R35-GM128645]
  2. NIH [R35-GM128645, R00HG0 08662, R35GM143532, R01AG066871, T32-GM067553, T32 GM007092, T32 GM135128]
  3. BrightFocus Foundation postdoctoral fellowship
  4. Cancer Prevention & Research Institute of Texas [RR170030]
  5. CZI Essential Open Source Software for Science (EOSS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, potential causal relationships between 3D chromatin structure, enhancers, and gene transcription were investigated using genome-wide mapping in macrophage activation. The results suggest that chromatin loops can facilitate transcription by connecting promoters to distal enhancers, while high levels of transcription may impede loop formation.
To infer potential causal relationships between 3D chromatin structure, enhancers, and gene transcription, we mapped each feature in a genome-wide fashion across eight narrowly spaced time points of macrophage activation. Enhancers and genes connected by loops exhibit stronger correlations between histone H3K27 acetylation and expression than can be explained by genomic distance or physical proximity alone. At these looped enhancer-promoter pairs, changes in acetylation at distal enhancers precede changes in gene expression. Changes in gene expression exhibit a directional bias at differential loop anchors; gained loops are associated with increased expression of genes oriented away from the center of the loop, and lost loops are often accompanied by high levels of transcription within the loop boundaries themselves. These results are consistent with a reciprocal relationship where loops can facilitate increased transcription by connecting promoters to distal enhancers, whereas high levels of transcription can impede loop formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据