4.8 Article

Impad1 and Syt11 work in an epistatic pathway that regulates EMT-mediated vesicular trafficking to drive lung cancer invasion and metastasis

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 40, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111429

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R37CA214609, 2P50CA070907-21A]
  2. CPRIT-MIRA [RP160652-P3]
  3. MD Anderson Physician-Scientist Program
  4. Rexanna's Foundation for Fighting Lung Cancer
  5. CPRIT Research Training Grant [RP170067]
  6. University of Texas MD Anderson Lung Cancer Moon Shots Program
  7. Cancer Center Support Grant [NCI P30 CA16672]
  8. Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) [RP190682]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals that Impad1 is a driver of lung cancer invasion and metastasis, and it modulates Golgi apparatus dynamics and vesicular trafficking to alter the extracellular matrix and tumor microenvironment, promoting the progression of lung cancer.
Lung cancer is a highly aggressive and metastatic disease responsible for approximately 25% of all cancerrelated deaths in the United States. Using high-throughput in vitro and in vivo screens, we have previously established Impad1 as a driver of lung cancer invasion and metastasis. Here we elucidate that Impad1 is a direct target of the epithelial microRNAs (miRNAs) miR-200 and miR similar to 96 and is de-repressed during epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT); thus, we establish a mode of regulation of the protein. Impad1 modulates Golgi apparatus morphology and vesicular trafficking through its interaction with a trafficking protein, Syt11. These changes in Golgi apparatus dynamics alter the extracellular matrix and the tumor microenvironment (TME) to promote invasion and metastasis. Inhibiting Impad1 or Syt11 disrupts the cancer cell secretome, regulates the TME, and reverses the invasive or metastatic phenotype. This work identifies Impad1 as a regulator of EMT and secretome-mediated changes during lung cancer progression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据