4.2 Article

The Portuguese version of the visual vertigo analog scale

期刊

BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
卷 88, 期 -, 页码 S125-S129

出版社

ASSOC BRASILEIRA OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA & CIRURGIA CERVICOFACIAL
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2022.09.004

关键词

Visual vertigo; Visual analog scale; Translation; Validity; Reliability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study translated and cross-culturally adapted the Visual Vertigo Analogue Scale (VVAS) from English to Portuguese, and validated its use for assessing self-perceived and severity of visual vertigo in Portuguese patients with vestibular disorders.
Objectives: Visual vertigo occurs after a vestibular disorder compromising daily living. It can be assessed by ''the Visual Vertigo Analogue Scale'' (VVAS), a self-administered questionnaire without Portuguese version. To perform the translation, cross cultural adaptation, and validation of VVAS from English to Portuguese. Methods: Prospective study involving the translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the VVAS into the Portuguese language, according to recognized guidelines. It was completed by 63 healthy controls and 198 participants with vestibulopathy who also completed the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) to further explore the link between DHI and VVAS. Groups were compared for severity of visual vertigo and VVAS reliability and internal consistency were tested. Results: The VVAS score was significantly higher in vestibular group (p < 0.001). A Cronbach's alpha of 0.9 confirmed the valid internally consistent of the applied version. The severity score of VVAS showed a positive strong correlation with DHI (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: The present Portuguese translation of the scale showed satisfactory properties for the assessment of self-perceived and severity of visual vertigo in a significant group of vestibular Portuguese patients. Level of evidence: 2. (c) 2022 Associacao Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cervico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据