期刊
BMJ OPEN
卷 12, 期 9, 页码 -出版社
BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061156
关键词
hepatobiliary disease; anaemia; hepatology
资金
- University Grant Commission, Colombo, Sri Lanka [UGC/VC/DRIC/PG2017(I)/KLN/03]
The FIB-4 score is not a reliable screening tool for detecting significant liver fibrosis (F2) in patients with chronic transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia (TDT), regardless of the cut-off point. The score may not accurately detect F2 fibrosis and has a low diagnostic yield.
Objective To evaluate the performance of the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score as a screening tool to detect significant liver fibrosis (F2) compared with transient elastography (TE), among chronic transfusion-dependent beta-thalassaemia (TDT) patients in a resource-poor setting. Design A cross-sectional study. Setting Adolescent and Adult Thalassaemia Care Centre (University Medical Unit), Kiribathgoda, Sri Lanka. Participants 45 TDT patients who had undergone more than 100 blood transfusions with elevated serum ferritin >2000 ng/mL were selected for the study. Patients who were serologically positive for hepatitis C antibodies were excluded. Outcome measures TE and FIB-4 scores were estimated at the time of recruitment in all participants. Predefined cut-off values for F2, extracted from previous TE and FIB-4 scores studies, were compared. A new cut-off value for the FIB-4 score was estimated using receiver operating characteristics curve analysis to improve the sensitivity for F2 prediction. Results Of the selected 45 TDT patients, 22 (49%) were males. FIB-4 score showed a significant linear correlation with TE (r=0.52;p<0.0003). The FIB-4 score was improbable to lead to a false classification of TDT patients to have F2 when the FIB-4 cut-off value was 1.3. On the other hand, it had a very low diagnostic yield in missing almost all (except one) of those who had F2. Using a much-lowered cut-off point of 0.32 for FIB-4, we improved the pick-up rate of F2 to 72%. Conclusions Regardless of the cut-off point, the FIB-4 score cannot be used as a good screening tool to pick up F2 in patients with TDT, irrespective of their splenectomy status. On the contrary, at a 1.3 cut-off value, though FIB-4 is a very poor detector for F2 fibrosis, it will not erroneously diagnose F2 fibrosis in those who do not have it.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据