4.6 Article

Diagnostic work-up of urinary tract infections in pregnancy: study protocol of a prospective cohort study

期刊

BMJ OPEN
卷 12, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063813

关键词

Urinary tract infections; BACTERIOLOGY; Protocols & guidelines; Microbiology; Maternal medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of urine dipstick analysis and urine sediment in pregnant women with urinary tract infections. Additionally, it will compare these tests to a predefined 'true urinary tract infection' in order to distinguish between an infection and asymptomatic bacteriuria.
Introduction Symptoms of urinary tract infections in pregnant women are often less specific, in contrast to non-pregnant women where typical clinical symptoms of a urinary tract infection are sufficient to diagnose urinary tract infections. Moreover, symptoms of a urinary tract infection can mimic pregnancy-related symptoms, or symptoms of a threatened preterm birth, such as contractions. In order to diagnose or rule out a urinary tract infection, additional diagnostic testing is required. The diagnostic accuracy of urine dipstick analysis and urine sediment in the diagnosis of urinary tract infections in pregnant women has not been ascertained nor validated. Methods and analysis In this single-centre prospective cohort study, pregnant women (>= 16 years old) with a suspected urinary tract infection will be included. The women will be asked to complete a short questionnaire regarding complaints, risk factors for urinary tract infections and baseline characteristics. Their urine will be tested with a urine dipstick, urine sediment and urine culture. The different sensitivities and specificities per test will be assessed. Our aim is to evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of urine dipstick analysis and urine sediment in comparison with urine culture (reference test) in pregnant women. In addition, we will compare these tests to a predefined 'true urinary tract infection', to distinguish between a urinary tract infection and asymptomatic bacteriuria. Ethics and dissemination Approval was requested from the Medical Ethics Review Committee of the Academic Medical Centre; an official approval of this study by the committee was not required. The outcomes of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据