4.4 Article

Immunohistochemical Staining to Identify Concomitant Systemic Mastocytosis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia with RUNX1 ::RUNX1T1

期刊

ANNALS OF LABORATORY MEDICINE
卷 42, 期 6, 页码 678-682

出版社

KOREAN SOC LABORATORY MEDICINE
DOI: 10.3343/alm.2022.42.6.678

关键词

Systemic Mastocytosis; Acute myeloid leukemia with RUNX1::RUNX1T1; KIT variant; Immunohistochemistry; Droplet digital PCR

资金

  1. SNUBH Research Fund [16-2017-006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Systemic mastocytosis with associated hematological neoplasm (SM-AHN) is not uncommon in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with RUNX1::RUNX1T1. CD117 and CD25 immunohistochemical staining play an important role in screening for SM-AHN after induction chemotherapy.
Systemic mastocytosis with associated hematological neoplasm (SM-AHN) poses diagnostic challenges because of the coexistence of atypical mast cell proliferation and hematological neoplasms. We assessed the presence of SM-AHN in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with RUNX1::RUNX1T1 from 2014 to 2020. Bone marrow (BM) samples were evaluated for mast cell aggregates using CD117 and CD25 immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. The KIT D816V variant burden at diagnosis and post induction was assessed using droplet digital PCR. Among 23 patients diagnosed as having AML with RUNX1::RUNX1T1, four (17.4%) were also diagnosed as having SM-AHN. No significant differences in clinical characteristics or overall survival (P=0.565) were observed between patients with or without SM-AHN, except for the presence of KIT variants (P=0.040). After induction therapy, IHC staining revealed the presence of mast cell aggregates in the BM, and the KIT D816V variant burden decreased with decreasing blast count and was similar in BM aspirates, smear slides, and sections. Concomitant SM-AHN was not infrequent in AML patients with RUNX1::RUNX1T1. This study showed the importance of CD117 and CD25 IHC staining after induction chemotherapy for SM-AHN screening, especially in patients with KIT variants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据